Based on the context and complexity of the site (read more here) – where ownership, finance, accessibility and public power were not aligned – we presented the site as a ‘wicked problem’ that required a multi-dimensional actor-focused approach. In June 2015, OSMOS was involved in the organisation and coordination of a complex stakeholder workshop on a large 460ha site within the Comune di Roma. The objective of the workshop was to bring a variety of local stakeholders together in order to create a systemic vision for the social-ecological transition of the “Parco Agricolo Casal del Marmo”.
The Lazio regional public business innovation agency (BIC Lazio) and the local municipality (Municipio Roma XIV) proposed the Parco Agricolo to be explored within the context of the TURAS project. The situation faced with can be considered to be wicked problem. Firstly the problem statement was ill-formulated since it was unclear what the actual task or question was that we were supposed to examine. Then information was confusing because the local actors possessed so many layers of often incommensurate knowledge about the site, including outputs of previous participatory planning actions for the site. There were likewise many clients and decision makers with conflicting values. TURAS was asked to work with local and regional agencies with different agendas and interests in the site and also had to consider a wide range of other private stakeholders such as the landowners.
The first action was to create a curatorial situation. We achieved this by suggesting to the local authorities that the complexities of the Parco’s development could be addressed by compressing a large variety of viewpoints and forms of knowledge in time and space, a compression that took the form of a three-day, on-site, hands-on workshop with around 60 participants from the area that was organised in June 2015. Due to high level of uncertainties regarding the unfolding of the workshop, we structured it as flexible as possible; its programme consisted of blocks of presentations followed by practical workshops whose content and sequence could be rearranged in real-time. The overall architecture of the workshop, however, was structured in form of the six steps of the curatorial approach presented above. During the three-day workshop we completed two full cycles: after finishing Step 5 in the morning of Day 2, we started again with Step 1.
- Step 1. Framing
- Step 2. Channeling
- Step 3. Engage via signification
- Step 4. Rechanneling
- Step 5. Reframing
- Step 6. Positioning
The outcome is summarised in the document below. One of the main conclusions is that a public / private organisation should be established – what we called a ‘Community Interest Company” (CIC). This CIC should have both the interest of the public and common good while being nimble enough to initiate projects of support good ideas. This will be one of the main areas of development for the following months.